Alpha & Omega Ministries Apologetics Blog
|
Paul: War-Monger for the Truth
01/20/2005 - James White
The widening influence of a sub-biblical world-view within Christian circles manifests itself in many ways: the diminishing emphasis upon the reality of God's Word as the certain touchstone of truth; the lack of passion for its study and application; the odd and strange appearance of those who lay claim to the name "Christian" and even "Reformed" and yet who do not mind redefining almost every single aspect of what it has always meant to be Christian or Reformed.I was recently referred to these words:
I did my time as an "apologist". The more I move away from it, the more I feel I'm finding a balance and a peace I never knew, and never would have known, had I continued being a War-Monger for The Truth.
Now, it is always best to acknowledge any possible truth in a statement, and surely I know of some who call themselves apologists and who are disagreeable just for the sake of being disagreeable. But since this same writer has applied the phrase "War-Monger" to me, particularly, in the past, I have to wonder: was Jude being a "war-monger" when he exhorted us to agonize for the faith once for all delivered to the saints? Was John being a "war-monger" when he wrote 1 John and took specific aim at the proto-gnostic docetists who were troubling the Christian congregation? And surely the Apostle Paul lacked all balance and peace when writing Galatians, let alone Colossians!
You see, there are two motivations for doing apologetics, one wrong, one good. You can do apologetics because you are afraid of challenges, and feel that your defense of your faith somehow insulates you from those challenges and bolsters your faith. That leads to bad, unbalanced apologetics. Or, you can do apologetics because you honor and value the Word of God and the truth of God and hence seek to honor Him through the offering of a defense of His truth, knowing this brings God glory, and is the necessary action of one who believes what you believe. That's why I do apologetics. What kind of peace, I wonder, does one find when the battle continues to wage around us? It is the peace of surrender, the peace of compromise. It is the peace of defining the enemy as my friend, the peace that no longer stands firm but instead "goes with the flow." It is a peace I pray God will never let me seek.
14:00:00 - Category: General Apologetics - Link to this article -
James White: Meanest of the Mean
01/03/2005 - James White
It is hard to find words to describe the response of Dave Armstrong to the review of his own published work. I mean, when you publish a book, do you expect that no one will respond to it, review it, check it for accuracy, examine it for apologetic coherence? When you claim to be able to perform action X (i.e., provide coherent, accurate exegesis and analysis of biblical passages) do you really think you should be given a pass when you consistently fail to do so? I'm sorry, but up till today the essence of DA's replies has been, "He's so mean! He's engaging in ad hominem!" Yet every example he provides refers to a statement where I am making observations, or providing conclusions, based upon the very factual and exegetical material that Mr. Armstrong has miserably failed to handle accurately (and, of course, he'd cite that as more ad hominem). ...[Click Here to Continue Reading]
20:08:51 - Category: General Apologetics - Link to this article -
|
