I played a portion of a debate from Justin Brierley's Unbelievable program in the UK where the Sikh representative turned out to be part of Dennis McKinsey's Biblical Errancy group. Then we took calls, including two on the subject of Jehovah's Witnesses. Made some hopefully helpful comments on the need to be grounded and balanced in studying the cults. Here's the program.

Don't forget that there will not be a live DL on Thursday, as Rich and I will be spending the day with our families. May God richly bless you all with a wonderful day of remembrance, thanks, and worship.

Sorry to be late getting this up. Rich's laptop, which he uses to do a lot of this stuff, died this morning (motherboard), so we are a little delayed. Yesterday we discussed the great non-event of a former pro-golfer promoting a long-refuted book attacking the deity of Christ, then we took a number of calls on a wide variety of issues. I started to get into an interesting topic toward the end, but then decided to take one last call, which turned out to be...well, you'll see. Here's the program.

Talked a bit about upcoming debate possibilities, including my getting in contact with Dr. Michael Brown, and the possibility of having him on the DL, and my being on his program as well. Played a caller objecting to Reformed theology from Dr. Brown's radio program, then took calls. Here's the program.

Started off with a song from our KJV Only friends, via the Amazing Grace Baptist Church KJV, called "Bogus Bible Blues." What a way to start! Then gave a brief report on Saturday's encounter with Imam Sayeed, and then dove back into the Geisler sermon, taking one call on God "changing his mind" at the end of the program. More important refutation of Dr. Geisler's eisegesis in this section, so if you've been following this examination, you'll want to listen in. Might even finish this soon, as there are only about 15 minutes left to cover! Here's the program.

Last Tuesday afternoon I had a Twitter "convo" with Wes from Atlanta. He started off saying he was listening to my presentation on Molinism and that he was amazed at my lack of "intellectual fortitude." He went on to say that I "misrepresent and slander" anyone who does not ride my particular "hobby horse," and he mentioned Caner, Craig, and Geisler as specific individuals I had attacked. We went back and forth for a while, and I invited him to call the DL to back up his allegations. So, he did. I gave him 22 minutes to provide a logical, reasonable substantiation of his allegations of misrepresentation and slander. I simply invite any fair minded person to listen and decide for yourself. We then took calls on Reformed theology, Federal Visionism, and some other topics. Here's the program.

Started with 12 minutes of review of two packages I had just gotten in the mail, and if you don't have a sense of humor, skip past that. :-) Spent the rest of the hour reviewing the next portion of Norman Geisler's "Why I'm Not a Five Point Calvinist" sermon. Twice I stopped to comment on why A&O will always be...A&O, unique, and out of the mainstream when it comes to political correctness and "playing nice." Here's the program.