Alpha & Omega Ministries Apologetics Blog
Tremendous Blessings for Bible Students Today
11/23/2012 - James WhiteI get lots of promotional e-mails from various companies from whom I've ordered materials, computer programs, etc. A few weeks ago I saw something from Logos that caught my eye. I have a huge Logos library. In fact, once I upgraded to Logos 5 (I guess I should be more specific...I was upgraded through the generosity of someone else) I was able to generate a bibliography of my entire library (something Logos 4 had constantly croaked upon attempting to do). The resultant PDF was 232 pages long. Yowsers. What a blessing! Add to that what I have in Accordance, in my Kindle library, and in my Papers library, and I clearly have passed the tipping point when it comes to electronic versus printed resources. Anyway, I was scanning through an ad from Logos when I saw something about a memorization tool. I looked at the ad and went, "Now THAT is useful."
Having gotten Logos5 up and running (the upgrade was easy, though, be warned--if you have a library my size, even a high powered MacBook Pro will get quite hot and bothered re-indexing your stuff) I have been busily entering my old memorization cards into the program so that I can make use of the memorization tool. I have suggested to Logos that it would be awesome if they could incorporate that feature into their mobile apps for iOS and Droid (since I use Logos on both platforms on my iPad and my Galaxy Nexus phone). Of course, you don't have to have the full tool to use those mobile apps to work on memorization, but it would be really nice.
Anyway, looking over my Logos library, using my Accordance program every day, recording books to mp3 through my Kindle, organizing papers and articles in Papers---really makes you wonder how Calvin ever wrote all those commentaries without this stuff! But seriously, we live in a day where we have so much available to us! Programs like BibleWorks, Logos, Accordance, etc., have become so amazingly advanced, so amazingly useful, it is incredible. Talk about something worth being thankful for!
Which program is best? The simple answer to that is...the one you have been using the longest, probably. In other words, the "big three" can all do the same things when it comes to Biblical research. Logos is in the lead as far as a library program is concerned, obviously---which would give a small edge to BibleWorks and Accordance in the strict Bible research area, but they are all moving in the same direction. I started with BibleWorks and added Logos back in my PC days. I moved to Accordance from BibleWorks when the folks at BW told me they were not going to provide a Mac version. Of course, that has now changed, and BW is moving into the Mac realm (too late for me, but that might be useful to others of you). Logos went Mac right around the time I did, so I was able to transition my library fairly easily. In any case, many, like myself, have to "double dip" in the sense that I am invested way too deeply in each platform to abandon those resources and repurchase them in another platform just to have singularity. So I will have Accordance and Logos running concurrently. For me, often I am using Accordance to do my linguistic studies while using Logos for my commentaries and background materials.
For someone just moving into these programs, it is obviously better to choose one and stick with it. And these days, any one of them offers you such a massive amount of material, it is truly an "embarrassment of riches." Surely something to be thankful for!
Is Hebrews 11:35-37 a Proof for the Inclusion of the Apocrypha to the Canon?
01/05/2012 - James SwanI came across a Roman Catholic blogger referring to one of my articles and using it in support of including the Apocrypha in the canon of sacred Scripture. He set up a Protestant straw man argument that states, "The New Testament Never Alludes to the Deuterocanon." Then my article is cited as stating "Hebrews 11:35-37 appears to be a reference to 2 Maccabees 7." I found it fascinating that this Roman Catholic blogger (who identifies himself as "an attorney in D.C.") would reference my article and ignore the argumentation that led to my concluding remarks. Below is the entirety of my article.
Is Hebrews 11:35-37 a Proof for the Inclusion of the Apocrypha to the Canon?
The author of Hebrews states, "The word of God is living and active, sharper than any double-edged sword, it penetrates even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; it judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart" (Heb. 4:12). The certainty that God has spoken, and has done so in a fixed number of inspired books has swung open the doors to several confessions of faith. The London Confession of Baptist Faith opens by stating, "The Holy Scripture is the only sufficient, certain and infallible rule of all saving knowledge, faith and obedience." The Westminster Confession states that God committed His word to writing, "for the better preserving and propagating of the truth, and for the more sure establishment and comfort of the church against the corruption of the flesh, and the malice of Satan and of the world." The confession adds, "those former ways of God's revealing his will unto his people being now ceased." This point, while seemingly innocuous and held to as a basic Christian presupposition, is a point of contention between historic Protestants and Roman Catholicism on the extent of the fixed canon of sacred Scripture. Roman Catholics since the sixteenth century Council of Trent are required by dogmatic decree to accept an additional set of books almost all exclusively written during the intertestamental period known as either the Apocrypha or Deuterocanon. While the argument over the inclusion or exclusion of these books generally takes place in the realm of historical analysis, certain internal biblical arguments for either inclusion or exclusion are likewise put forth. One such internal argument is based on Hebrews 11:35-37.
Hebrews 11:35-37 states, "(35) Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection. (36) and others experienced mockings and scourgings, yes, also chains and imprisonment. (37) They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, ill-treated."
These verses, while intended to be a statement supporting the exposition and implication of biblical faith actually serve as a popular proof-text in the debate over the extent of the Hebrew canon. Those of Roman Catholic persuasion argue these verses are at least an allusion to 2 Maccabees 7:1, 13-14, if not a direct reference. These verses state,
"(1) It came to pass also, that seven brethren with their mother were taken, and compelled by the king against the law to taste swine's flesh, and were tormented with scourges and whips. (13) Now when this man was dead also, they tormented and mangled the fourth in like manner. (14) So when he was ready to die he said thus, It is good, being put to death by men, to look for hope from God to be raised up again by him: as for thee, thou shalt have no resurrection to life."
Is this parallel justified? Roman Catholic apologist Robert Sungenis argues that there are "over two dozen such allusions between the Deutero-canonicals and the New Testament" [Robert Sungenis, Not By Scripture Alone (Santa Barbara: Queenship Publishing), p.278]. He lists this passage along with many others. According to Roman Catholic apologists, the reason for such parallels are due to the fact that the Bible used by the New Testament writers was the Greek Septuagint. Roman Catholics hold this Bible translation contained the Deuterocanon, and the disputed books were treated implicitly as sacred scripture by the New Testament authors, as well as the early church. Recently, Roman Catholic apologists have had a boost of support from a recent book, Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger by Gary Michuta. Mr. Michuta has presented the first full-length defense of Apocrypha inclusion coming from a Roman Catholic perspective in quite a while.
Michuta argues that Hebrews 11:35 is indeed a reference to the Maccabean martyrs, and is so with "a high degree of certainty." First, there are no other examples presented in the Greek Old Testament of persons undergoing torture and not accepting deliverance for the hope of a better resurrection."[Gary Michuta, Why Catholic Bibles Are Bigger (Port Huron: Grotto Press, 2007), p. 37]. Second, 2 Maccabees twice explicitly refers to a "hope for a better resurrection" as does Hebrews 11:35. Third, Michuta finds linguistic similarities between the words rendered "tormented" (or "tortured") in Hebrews with Eleazar's martyrdom in Maccabees. Hebrew 11:36 mentions "mockings and scourgings" as does 2 Maccabees 7:7, "So when the first was dead after this number, they brought the second to make him a mocking stock: and when they had pulled off the skin of his head with the hair, they asked him, Wilt thou eat, before thou be punished throughout every member of thy body?" Michuta summarizes these points by stating, "Apart from dogmatic prejudice, this reference to 2 Maccabees is unquestionable, and both Catholic and Protestant scholars rightly acknowledge this point of contact between Hebrews and the Deuterocanonical book of 2 Maccabees."[Ibid., p. 37].
If it can be established that the New Testament writers quoted the Apocrypha as Scripture, it would follow that the Protestant Bible is missing inspired God-breathed books. Michuta concludes his book by stating, "The removal of the Deuterocanon is indeed a matter of supreme importance, since it affects the very Word of God Himself; and its effects can be shown to have been devastating in both theology and practice"[Ibid., p. 308]. Has Mr. Michuta and Roman Catholic apologetics proved their contention? Did the writer of Hebrews implicitly consider the Apocrypha as God inspired scripture, and quote it as such in Hebrews 11?
At stake in such a controversy is the very certainty of the word of God. If Rome is correct, the Old Testament that the author of Hebrews believed in is not the same Old Testament that that the Westminster divines believed in. When the author of Hebrews stated the word of God is living, active, with a piercing sharpness, have Protestants dulled the blade by leaving the Apocryphal books out? Can Protestants consistently and actually find comfort and exhortation in the testimonies of faith found in Hebrew 11 if they actually deny the Biblical books from which the author compiled his list of faith's heroes?
Before delving specifically into answering these questions, it is crucial to review the immediate context surrounding the passage in dispute. The writer of the book of Hebrews exhorts his readers to persevere amidst trials and persecution (Heb. 10:19-39). He reminds his readers that earlier they had earlier stood their ground "in a great contest in the face of suffering" (Heb, 10:32), even while being "publicly exposed to insult and persecution" (Heb. 10:33). They need to persevere (Heb. 10:36), because they are those who do not "shrink back" and are destroyed (Heb. 10:39).
They are those who are to live by faith, and are themselves part of a great community of saints. Surrounded by a great cloud of witnesses (Heb. 12:1) described at length in Hebrews 11, they are those whose faith was authored and finished be their great high priest, Jesus Christ (Heb. 12:3). Hebrews 11 presents a substantial panoply of specific events in Biblical history, beginning at creation, and taking the reader on a rapid journey through Hebrew history. The writer mentions and expounds briefly on specific individuals: Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, and Rahab. All these mentioned have explicit Biblical references to substantiate their place among the heroes of faith. The writer of Hebrews also speaks of Israel collectively living by faith during the Exodus, and the claiming of the land promised to them by God.
Noting his limitation by time, toward the end of the chapter the writer ventures from the specific to general. He is unable to specifically expound with greater depth on others included in the great cloud of witnesses (Heb. 11:32). These though, are no less important: Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jepthah, David, Samuel, and the prophets (Heb. 11:32). Similar to those presented in Hebrews 11:1-31, these names also find explicit mentioning in the Old Testament. These people would have been as familiar to the Hebrews as were those the writer did expound on. Hebrews 11:33-40 appears to be expounding on the names just mentioned:
"(33) Who by faith conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions, (34) quenched the power of fire, escaped the edge of the sword, from weakness were made strong, became mighty in war, put foreign armies to flight. (35)Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection; (36) and others experienced mockings and scourgings, yes, also chains and imprisonment. (37) They were stoned, they were sawn in two, they were tempted, they were put to death with the sword; they went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, ill-treated (38) (men of whom the world was not worthy), wandering in deserts and mountains and caves and holes in the ground. (39) And all these, having gained approval through their faith, did not receive what was promised, (40) because God had provided something better for us, so that apart from us they would not be made perfect."
P. E. Hughes states this description is "spontaneous and unstudied" [William Lane, Hebrews 9-13 (WBC 47B) (Waco: Word, 1991), p. 385]. William Lane says these verses "presupposes a rather detailed knowledge of the OT and of Jewish history on the part of the writer and the congregation addressed" [Ibid., p. 385]. He further expounds on this section from Hebrews noting the section includes nine short clauses in vv 33-34. He speculates, "The first three appear to form a group prompted by the antecedent reference to those named in v 32b" [Ibid., p.385]. Verse 33 describes those "who by faith conquered kingdoms, performed acts of righteousness, obtained promises, shut the mouths of lions." This verse clearly applies to those mentioned in Hebrews 11:32. Verse 33 first notes those "who by faith conquered kingdoms." As Albert Barnes noted long ago, "The meaning is, that some of them subdued kingdoms, others obtained promises, etc. Thus, Joshua subdued the nations of Canaan; Gideon the Midianites; Jephtha the Ammonites; David the Philistines, Amalekites, Jebusites, Edomites, etc." [Albert Barnes, Notes, on the Epistle to the Hebrews (London: George Routledge and Sons, 1876) pp. 293-294]. Here easily documented Biblical figures correspond to the description offered. These also "performed acts of righteousness." As John Gil described, these people "exercised vindictive justice, in taking vengeance on the enemies of God, and his people; civil righteousness, in the discharge of their offices; and moral righteousness, in their conversation before God and men" [John Gil , The Collected Works of John Gil (electronic edition) (Baptist Standard Bearer, 2002)]. These people also "obtained promises," promises from God to their posterity, specifically promises to be in God?s people, ruled by His Messiah.
Specific acts of courage and faith then follow. Some who lived by faith were able to "shut the mouths of lions." While some of the intended audience may have thought of Samson killing a lion in Judges 14:6, the reference was most likely to Daniel in the lion's den (Daniel 6). Daniel was also able to "quench the power of fire" as recorded in Daniel 3. Others "escaped the edge of the sword," perhaps an allusion to David as recorded in 2 Kings 6:16 in which David fled from Saul's deadly pursuit. Some "from weakness were made strong" may be an allusion to Samson who at times received increases in bodily strength, or David, who in times of weakness was refreshed by the Lord. Some "became mighty in war" and "put foreign armies to flight" could refer to most of those names mentioned in Hebrews 11:32. Recall how Gideon overthrew the camp of the Midianites.
From the preceding, it is obvious the writer to the Hebrews assumes his readers are quite familiar with the history of the Jewish people as recorded in the Bible. William Lane implies through his exposition of this section that the examples given in 11:32-40 not only show a deep familiarity with the biblical record, but possibly a correspondence to Jewish extra-biblical history as well. Lane points out that these two counts of divine deliverance reported in the book of Daniel are linked and mentioned together in Jewish tradition in 1 Maccabees 2:59-60; 3 Maccabees 6:6-7; 4 Maccabees 16:3, 21; 18: 12-13 [Lane, p.386]. He also states, "The reference to David is not surprising since he holds such a firm place in the exemplary tradition (e.g., Sir 45:25; 47:2-11; 1 Macc 2:15)" [Ibid., 384]. Lane see verse 34 as not only deeply biblical, but also "richly illustrated in the early Maccabean resistance to Seleucid repression at the time of Antiochus IV Epipihanes (cf. 1 Macc 3:17-25; 4:6-22, 34-36)" [Ibid., p. 387]. Despite Lane's appeal to Jewish tradition, one thing is most certain; the names and descriptions presented in Hebrews 11:32-34 are first and foremost biblical. Lane himself is most aware of this. Commenting on the overall structure of Hebrews 11, he states, "In brief, the introduction, first two examples, and conclusion of Heb 11:1-40 take the form of a list of attested exemplars who receive divine approval in the pages of Scripture" [Ibid., p.319]. It is to the controversial verses that we now turn. Does the writer to the Hebrews abandon the Biblical text, or does he have a different Old Testament than that used by Protestants?
Hebrews 11:35 states, "Women received back their dead by resurrection; and others were tortured, not accepting their release, so that they might obtain a better resurrection." Some commentators see "Women received back their dead by resurrection" as an allusion to the widow at Zarephath of Sidon, who saw her dead son come back to life by the faith of Elijah (1 Kings 17:17-24). Jamieson, Fausset and Brown point out the oldest manuscripts read, "They received women of aliens by raising their dead." They point out "1 Kings 17:24 shows that the raising of the widow's son by Elijah led her to the faith, so that he thus took her into fellowship, an alien though she was" [Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, Commentary on Hebrews (ESword Electronic Edition, 2008)]. Other commentators see the verse alluding to the Shunamite in 2 Kings 4:36. William Lane argues the language in 35a parallels that used by the LXX in 2 Kings 4:37 which states, "The woman?received her son."
"Others were tortured" is the first glimpse of a possible Apocryphal allusion. Barnes notes, "The word which is used here - t?Ápa???? tumpanizo - to 'tympanize,' refers to a form of severe torture" that also is described in 2 Maccabees 6:19-29 [Barnes, pp. 294-295]. Likewise, William Lane sees the word translated as "tortured" as the rack or stake to which people were tied to, as described in 2 Maccabees 6:19, 28. Calvin notes that some have translated the word as "imprisoned," but likewise agrees, "the simple meaning is, as I think, that they were stretched on a rack, as the skin of a drum, which is distended" [Calvin, The comprehensive John Calvin collection 2.0 (Ages Digital Library, 2002)].
Lane also sees "not accepting their release" as a statement "amply illustrated by the behavior of the ninety-year-old scribe, Eleazar, who refused the pretense of renouncing commitment to God so that he might 'be released from death' (2 Macc 6:22). He willingly chose the rack and endured a brutal beating" [Lane, p. 389]. In 2 Maccabees 6:30 Eleazar states, "But when he was ready to die with stripes, he groaned, and said, It is manifest unto the Lord, that hath the holy knowledge, that whereas I might have been delivered from death, I now endure sore pains in body by being beaten: but in soul am well content to suffer these things, because I fear him." Jamieson, Fausset and Brown, and John Gil, state a similar opinion. John Calvin comes close to locating the allusion away from the Apocrypha, but likewise states, "Now though they say that Jeremiah was stoned, that Isaiah was sawn asunder, and though sacred history relates that Elijah, Elisha, and other Prophets, wandered on mountains and in caves; yet I doubt not but he here points out those persecutions which Antiochus carried on against God's people, and those which afterwards followed" [Calvin, The comprehensive John Calvin collection 2.0 (Ages Digital Library, 2002)].
"So that they might obtain a better resurrection" is best understood as a contrast with those children restored to their mothers mentioned in verse 35. The "better resurrection" is one in which death does not return as it did to those sons given back those their mothers. Lane states, "The reference to the refusal of release and the enduring of torment in the context of a firm expectation of attaining the resurrection shows unmistakably that the allusion in v 35b is to 2 Macc 6:18-7:42, where the Jewish historian recounts the martyrdom of Eleazar and of a mother and her seven sons at the hands of Antiochus IV Epiphanes and his officers. Specific reference is made to the hope of the resurrection in the account of the sufferings endured by three of the seven brothers, as well as in the encouragement offered to them by their mother (2 Macc 7:9, 11, 14, 22-23, 29)" [ Lane, p.389]. On this phrase, Albert Barnes comments that, "No particular instance of this kind is mentioned in the Old Testament; but amidst the multitude of cases of persecution to which good men were subjected, there is no improbability in supposing that this may have occurred. The case of Eleazer, recorded in 2 Macc. 6, so strongly resembles what the apostle says here, that it is very possible he may have had it in his eye" [Barnes, pp. 294-295].
The phrase, "and others experienced mockings and scourgings, yes, also chains and imprisonment" can find support for the abusive persecution of the prophets documented in 2 Chronicles 36:23; Jeremiah 20:7-8; 37:15-16, 18-20; 38: 6-13. John Gill notes "As Samson by the Philistines; Elisha by the children, whom the bears devoured; Jeremiah by Pashur, and others; the Jews by Sanballat and Tobiah, when building the temple; the prophets, whom God sent to the Jews, as his messengers, and scourgings; or smitings, as Jeremiah and Micaiah, yea, moreover of bonds and imprisonment; as Joseph, Samson, and Jeremiah, Gen 39:20. Now of these things they had trial, or experience; their graces were tried by them, and they patiently endured them" [John Gil , The Collected Works of John Gil (electronic edition) (Baptist Standard Bearer, 2002)]. The abuse described does again find support from 2 Maccabees 7:1.
"They were stoned," finds mention of Biblical support from 2 Chronicles 24:20-21 in which the prophet Zechariah was killed in such a way. The New Testament though infers Jerusalem used this method against God's prophets often in the past (Matt 23:27; Luke 13:34). Jewish tradition gives various accounts of the stoning of the prophet Jeremiah in the Midrash Aggadah and 4 Baruch, a theme picked up on by the early church in The Lives of the Prophets, a work attributed to Epiphanius, bishop of Salamis (315-403 C.E.).
"They were sawn in two" could refer to the tradition about the death of Isaiah in which he was found hiding in a tree trunk, and thus killed by a saw for taking refuge in a tree. The Ascension of Isaiah was well known in the early church. It had wide circulation, with manuscripts extant in Ethiopic, Coptic, Slavonic, Latin and also, some segments of it can be found in Greek. The tradition concerning Isaiah's dreadful death by Manasseh was popular in Jewish, Christian, and Gnostic circles. John Gill reviews different versions of the story found in Jewish tradition, and then notes how widely accepted it was in the early church by Justin Martyr, Origen, Tertullian, Lactantius, Athanasius, Hilary, Cyril of Jerusalem, Gregory Nyssene, Jerome, Isidorus Pelusiota, Gregentius, Procopius Gazaeus, and others.
The phrase "they were tempted" could allude to many different biblical personages, like Job, tempted by Satan. John Gill sees Eleazar and the seven brethren with their mother tempted to deny the faith and renounce the worship of God in 2 Maccabees 6:7. Albert Barnes likewise locates one of the descriptions of those tempted in the Apocrypha: "Amidst the sorrows of martyrs, therefore, it was not improper to say that they were tempted, and to place this among their most aggravated woes. For instances of this nature, see 2 Macc. 6:21, 22; 7:17, 24" [Barnes, pp. 295-296].
"They were put to death with the sword" presents the opposite of those who, in verse 34, "escaped the edge of the sword." Eighty-five priests were slain by Doeg 1Sa_22:18. Lane points out, "Elijah escaped the wrath of Jezebel, but other prophets had not been so fortunate (1 Kgs 18:4, 13; 19:10). The prophet Uriah?was 'struck down by the sword'" [Lane ,p. 391]. Lane though adds, "The fate of being murdered by the sword was certainly not an isolated experience in the OT or in the post-biblical period (cf. 1 Macc 1:30; 2:9, 38; 5:13; 7:15-17, 19; 2 Macc 5:24-26)" [Ibid., p, 391].
Elijah and Elisha certainly "went about in sheepskins, in goatskins, being destitute, afflicted, ill-treated." Zechariah 13:4 infers that this was the standard garb of a prophet. Within the early church, 1 Clement urged believers to imitate "those who went about in goatskins and sheepskins, heralding the coming of Christ; we mean Elijah and Elisha, and moreover Ezekiel, the prophets" (1 Clement 17:1).
1 Kings 18:4 records prophets hiding in caves. Certainly the biblical prophets fit the description "men of whom the world was not worthy." 2 Maccabees 10:6 records, "And they kept the eight days with gladness, as in the feast of the tabernacles, remembering that not long afore they had held the feast of the tabernacles, when as they wandered in the mountains and dens like beasts." Albert Barnes likewise finds Apocryphal allusion: "Compare 1 Macc. 1:53; 2 Macc. 5:27; 6:7. The instances mentioned in the books of Maccabees are so much in point, that there is no impropriety in supposing that Paul referred to some such cases, if not these very cases. As there is no doubt about their historic truth, there was no impropriety in referring to them, though they are not mentioned in the canonical books of Scripture. One of those cases may be referred to as strikingly illustrating what is here said. 'But Judas Maccabeus with nine others or thereabout, withdrew himself into the wilderness, and lived in the mountains after the manner of beasts, with his company, who fed on herbs continually lest they should be partakers of the pollution;' 2 Macc. 5:27" [Barnes, pp. 296-297].
It seems highly probable the writer to the Hebrews alluded to the Apocrypha in chapter 11. The parallels Roman Catholic apologists suggest particularly in verse 35 and 2 Maccabees seem likely. "Others were tortured," "not accepting their release" and "so that they might obtain a better resurrection" appear to be the closest points of contact with 2 Maccabees. As noted above, other vague points of contact could be inferred, but not with the same level of certitude of these three statements. Within the arena of rhetoric and polemics, the above study demonstrates that Protestant exegetes do not disagree with the possibility of Apocryphal allusions in Hebrews 11. Protestants are not hiding the fact that 2 Maccabees may be what the writer to the Hebrews has in mind.
Did the writer of Hebrews therefore implicitly consider the Apocrypha as God inspired scripture, and quote it as such in Hebrews 11? This does not necessarily follow. Other non-biblical books are quoted in scripture, but not treated as Scripture. Jude quotes from the Apocryphal Book of Enoch in Jude 14, and some see a possible allusion to the Assumption of Moses in Jude 1:9. Paul quotes pagan poets and philosophers on Mars Hill, and an allusion to the Penitence of Jannes and Jambres may be found in 2 Timothy 3:8.
Even within Hebrews, the writer may be alluding to spurious accounts concerning Jeremiah and Isaiah in 11:37. Sensing the weight of such a criticism, Roman Catholic apologist Gary Michuta states, "The reference to the noncanonical book, The Ascension of Isaiah, in Heb 11:37 does not negate my point. It is not my contention that Heb 11 used only information supplied by Scripture, but that it uses only biblical figures to illustrate supernatural faith. That is clear from the preceding context. The reference to those who were 'sawn in two' is an expansion on the biblical figure of the prophet Isaiah. One can find numerous expansions of biblical figures in the New Testament from apocryphal sources, but none introduces new biblical characters" [Michuta, 41]. Does such an explanation satisfy? No, for it is an invention of Roman Catholic apologetics to weave around an obvious flaw in argumentation. On what basis does one decide that expansion is an allowable method in the usage of non-biblical material for the inspired writers? It is a created distinction. There is nothing within the dogmatic statements from Rome noting this as an accepted method of biblical interpretation.
Roman Catholics argue that since the Septuagint contained Apocryphal books, they were considered scripture. This argument fails for a number of reasons. First, it is not certain that simply because an Apocryphal book was found in an LXX that the Jews considered it scripture. Like the early church, the books could have been included to be used for reading and edification but not considered inspired scripture. Second, the extant evidence shows different Apocryphal books are included in different early manuscripts. That is, no early manuscript contains all the Apocryphal books argued for by Rome. Some of the early manuscripts actually contain 3 and 4 Maccabees, writings not considered canonical by Rome.
Contrary to Roman Catholic claims, it does not follow that Protestant Bibles are missing inspired God-breathed books. Rather, the writer to the Hebrews included both heroes of faith from the Bible and Jewish tradition. For the writer of Hebrews, the word of God is living and active, sharper than any double-edged sword, penetrating even to dividing soul and spirit, joints and marrow; judging the thoughts and attitudes of the heart. This did not mean for the writer that God's hand cannot be seen in extra-biblical history. As in our own day, the promises of Scripture are to be clung to as God's hand of providence directs history. Since each ounce of history is directed by God, the lives of his people both from the Bible and those outside the Bible, can be seen as examples of those who live by faith, and referred to for encouragement.
Now THAT is an Upgrade!
02/14/2011 - James WhiteSo I arrive at Trinity Road Chapel Sunday morning. I'm going to be preaching from Mark 15. I figured I'd use my Accordance app on my iPad, but decided I might use my OliveTree Bible reader instead, just to have both Greek and English available. So I fire it up and am surprised to see a gorgeous green leather cover type graphic appear rather than the wooden one that I was accustomed to. Seems there was an upgrade the last time I updated my apps.
But what greeted my eyes once it loaded was pretty amazing. This isn't just a slight tweak, a few new features. No, this is an entirely new program. Now sometimes that is unsettling for those of us of Scottish extraction, but I had to immediately admit, the "look" is very impressive. As I started to tap around and explore, I grew more impressed. I did not have a lot of time before the service, but I chose to use it for the service, and it worked well.
That evening I was preaching through Romans 9:1-24, so I was doing some more exploring before the service. I decided to show the new program to my friend Doug McMasters, the pastor of Trinity Road Chapel. While we were looking at it, I clicked on a note I had inserted from my book at Romans 9:5. We were both utterly amazed to discover that not only did it open the note in a very readable fashion, but it had converted all biblical references to live links to the relevant texts, in Greek! Wow! What a massive leap forward in the notes area!
Seeing is believing, so here is the video from the OliveTree folks about the new BibleReader 5.0:
For speaking from the iPad (sermons, especially, teaching Bible Studies, etc.), OliveTree has catapulted itself right into the top spot with this upgrade. While Accordance still rules the roost as far as data available goes (Logos, with all its rich resources, has always been saddled with a horrifically unfriendly interface, and that remains the case with its iPad app), the Accordance app is graphically nowhere near this new BibleReader version. Note to Accordance: the "dial" type navigation has to go. BibleReader does it right. We have to be able to get to texts quickly while speaking, and the dial type navigation is slow and attention intensive. Now if OliveTree could rustle up some textual critical modules, it might start giving Accordance a race in the scholarly area as well!
12/30/2010 - Alan Kurschnerhere and here.
Digital Resources: Books By Dr. White
06/29/2010 - James SwanI have quite a number of digital books on my computer. Most of you are probably familiar with Bibleworks, Logos, and Libronix. I recently found a software package that includes book add-ons of Dr. White's books, as well as some other texts I use frequently.
Digital books by Dr. White
The Forgotten Trinity
The God Who Justifies
Mary- Another Redeemer?
The Roman Catholic Controversy
The Same Sex Controversy
Debating Calvinism: Five Points, Two Views
Other Helpful Resources
Holy Scripture: The Ground and Pillar of Our Faith, Vol. I
Holy Scripture: The Ground and Pillar of Our Faith, Vol. III
Holy Scripture: The Ground and Pillar of Our Faith, Vol. II
The Matthew 16 Controversy: Peter and the Rock
The Old Testament Canon and the Apocrypha
Roman Catholic Tradition: Claims and Contradictions
Thank You, Thank You
01/05/2009 - James WhiteRich just informed me that we have reached our goal and will be able to order the audio/video computer. My sincerest thanks to all who participated. I hope as you see the videos going out and read about people being blessed thereby that you will feel a part of what we are doing here.
I would like to also thank you for providing the two volumes of Origen's commentaries as well. They were purchased this morning from my ministry resources list. I look forward to being able to check some important assertions against these resources in preparation for the upcoming debate.
This Is Just Amazing (If You Are a Geek)
02/24/2007 - James WhiteOK, I have joined the legions of mind-numbed zombies with a Blackberry. I must admit it is the most amazingly well designed, intuitive electronic device I have ever used. It is the closest thing I will probably ever have to a secretary. Just amazing. So, I've been looking to put juts a few things on it to increase its usefulness since it will be the one item with me at pretty much all times. I am not looking to replace the massive library of stuff I have on my Palm, as that will continue to function as before. But there are times you just want to "go light," so I've put a Bible on it, for example, and a few utilities. Well, last evening I saw a section called "religion" so I started looking around, and found the "Quran Reader Pro." I have a number of Islamic programs on my computers, such as Al-Alim, but I am amazed at the capabilities of this program, including search functions in Arabic! Of course, I should probably avoid standing in line at the airport using it, but it is a great addition to my library of resources. I have used the Qur'an on my Palm a dozen times while giving presentations all across the country and in the UK. I have a limited amount of memory, and as I noted, am not looking to replace my Palm, so it is just a matter of "what you might need in a flash" as to what I load on the Blackberry. I will probably put the LDS Scriptures on as well since I have that in the MobiPocket edition. Geeks press on!
Hey, Live Blogging!
11/02/2006 - James WhiteBummed you aren't with us in Orlando? Missed seeing me shaking hands with John Shelby Spong in the corridor just now? Well, keep a stiff upper lip, bucko! The geeks amongst you may rejoice! There will be live blogging from the conference! Yes indeedy, proving that our folks are uber-geeks, some who are attending the event have put together www.pulpitcrimes.blogspot.com, and they will be blogging live as the conference and debate progresses! So tonight, when Tom Ascol and I do our "What We Wish the Students at Liberty Could Have Heard" presentation, you'll be able to catch the action...not exactly live, in the sense of a live audio stream (someday, someday), but you'll be able to follow via that blog! So bookmark it and join in the experience of our national conference in Orlando, even if you aren't here! And pray for us as well as we seek to honor the Lord, and defend His truth!
When It Works, It Works
09/09/2005 - James WhiteOn my travels last week four technological items (and one program) worked so flawlessly, so perfectly, that I thought I should mention them. Instead of complaints, time to give some kudos to items and programs that actually do what they are supposed to do, and do it well.
First, the Palm Tungsten T5. I read my opening statement on it. I used it as my Bible. I used it as my Greek text (at one point checking a claim by Dr. Crossan and finding him in error on the term used, though, of course, he wasn't looking at the text himself). I used a great program on it to store quotes and my cross-examination questions, a program that is easy to use and is simply perfect for storing data in a form that you can access quickly and easily. It is called Note Studio. It isn't cheap. But it works, and works well. Best organization/note card program I've ever encountered. Highly recommended.
Now, let me warn you about something...if you have used the earlier Tungsten Palm devices (Tungsten, T3), and liked, as I did, the aluminum hard case Palm sells (I noted Tom Ascol had a T3 with a hard case with him on the cruise), whatever you do, do not get the T5 hard case. It is worthless. Talk about missing the point! The earlier hard case made sense: it was easy to get the unit in and out of it; you could turn it on, beam with it, plug in a headphone jack, etc., all while it was still in the case. But the genius who designed the new hard case for the T5 obviously has never actually used the T5, or any other Palm device. Getting the unit in and out of the new case is a chore, but more importantly, once it is in the case, you cannot beam; you cannot plug anything in; you cannot even get the stylus out or even turn it on and off without having to try to pull the device up and out of the portion it lies in (which isn't easy either). A complete example of how to take a good idea and make it stupid in one fell swoop. Thankfully, Vaja makes a gorgeous case for the T5 that is functional and oh so wonderful (especially if you love the smell of Argentinian leather).
Next, I have had the Dell Inspiron 8600 for about a year now. Aside from the touch pad, which simply does not like my attempts at double tapping, this laptop is the best I've ever owned (and I've owned quite a few). Bullet proof. Gorgeous display, excellent battery life, accessories work well...it just does what it is supposed to do. Dell gets blasted a lot, but I have never had a problem at all, and this one has proven a real workhorse, traveling all over the US, England, Scotland, and Italy, without a single problem.
Next, I love my digital camera. It is the Sony Cyber-Shot DSC-W1 5.1 Mega Pixel unit (looks like mine is gone, but this is the current version). Again, it simply works, and what I love about it is that it has a very large screen that actually allows you to see the picture you have just taken with some meaningful level of resolution. Again, a unit that does what it claims to do. The gorgeous Alaska pictures I've posted came from that camera. A great investment.
Finally, one more piece of technology I took with me that I can very, very highly recommend: the Canon iP90 portable printer. We bought this little unit for me when I was in St. Louis back in February. It is very portable (fits in one of my Oakley backpacks along with our digital projector with room to spare), produces gorgeous, high-quality documents, even after being lugged around and shoved under airplane seats and run through security-point screening machines, and rolling down the rollers and running into other luggage---you get the idea---and that on the first sheet of paper. This crazy little unit also prints color, vibrant, high-quality color pictures, at like 1400 dpi or something along those lines. And it communicates with my laptop via the infrared port (i.e., I don't have to carry yet another proprietary USB cable around). Talk about a blessing in a hotel room, where I can print out my boarding pass for the early, early flight in the morning, or a copy of my sermon notes or debate notes (always good to have a back up should my Palm take a dive). I have been tremendously pleased with the quality of this printer, and couldn't recommend it more highly.
So, there's your tech fix for the...month, or something. :-)
Louw & Nida Available for Palm OS from OliveTree
03/30/2005 - James WhiteWith the availability of huge, 1-gig and above SD cards for Palm devices now, it is great to see resources like this coming on line. Louw & Nida's Greek lexicon based upon semantic domains is now available for Palm from OliveTree (they also make available the Gramcord Greek NT). As I traveled in England/Scotland, and as I look forward to a trip to Italy in a few weeks, I find my Palm T3 an invaluable resource. I used it as my preaching text more than once, and it is so much easier to study from it while on a train or a plane than it is to try to dig out the laptop. Now, of course, my laptop has a full Libronics library on it, etc., and the Palm devices are not quite ready for that huge amount of data, but believe me, as one who started with a painfully slow, green-screen Palm device with a whopping 2 megs of total memory, having the Greek text, Gramcord, Louw-Nida, and all the rest I have on my T3 is a tremendous blessing. Geeks unite and check it out.