Dave Hunt and What Love is This? on YouTube #2

by Mark Ennis Genesis 4:15-385,  6:5-314, 6:11-314, 18:25-274, 20:6-41, 61, 320, 359, 24:5-341, 24:58-341, 25:23-105 26:29-333, 34:14-287, 44:22-287, 50:20-43, 56, 61, 320, 327, 396, 397, Exodus 4:21-105 7:13-105 7:14-105 7:22-105 8:15-105 9:7-105 9:34-105 9:12-105 9:35-105 10:2-105 10:20-105 10:27-105 11:10-105 12:3-186, 12:6-13-291 n23, 12:7-186, 12:13-186, 12:15-385, 12:22-209, 12:37-38-291 n22, 14:4-105 14:8-105 14:17-105 25:2-311, 25:2-9-356, 33-352, |33:18-34:7-341, 351, 33:19-341, 351, 34:24-41, 359,

I was just catching up on comments left by Mr. Enloe in response to my blog (comments that do not use names, but refer to me anyway, as if that somehow allows him to fulfill his commitment to not address me, while accusing me of every kind of sin under the sun anyway….wait, you aren’t supposed to do that, are

Four more devastating refutations (#1, #2, #3, #4) of the man who evidently has no idea how to handle being in way over his head. Yes, I do intend on continuing that series, though given the level to which Holding has sunk in his responses to both myself and Steve Hays, I have no interest at all in engaging him

While my focus is primarily upon the issue of Roman Catholic inclusivism for the debate tomorrow night, I couldn’t help but run into an e-mail written to the Internet Monk regarding his former view that “Calvinism is Cool,” asserting just the opposite. It was referred to under the incredible title, “Finally Some Honesty about Calvinist Baptists” from a former “Calvinist

   While no end of interesting illustrations could be mined from continuing to review Jimmy Akin’s desperate attempt to avoid admitting he simply doesn’t care to keep abreast with developments in his area of self-professed expertise, I likewise find the task most distasteful. I have not invested much time perusing the comments on Akin’s blog, but I did look through a