January 17, 2006

Mainly went over this article and its capitulation to the redefinition of the word “hate” as well as the entire concept of determining ethics and morality and right and wrong based upon the emotions and perceptions of people who have already proven themselves to be deeply dysfunctional in the entirety of their personal lives. I had seen the article last

As some of you may have noted, things are changing, and improving, with our webcasting routine. Last week we began streaming in forms other than Real Audio, to the great rejoicing of many. Today we begin to make the Dividing Line available in mp3 format, here. Yes, we have heard you, and yes, we are working on even greater improvements

Two rather different topics today on the DL, but I went at both of them with some level of passion, to be sure. For the first half of the program I talked directly to Bassam Zawadi and other Islamic apologists on the topic of the Qur’an and its relationship to the Bible. Some may be lost in the discussion, but,

Above is the first half hour of the program. Following this discussion I moved back into a review of, and response to, both Diaa Mohamed and Bart Ehrman. A total of 90 minutes.

Started off playing clips from the April, 2005 appearance of a faux-jihadi before the US Marines, aka, Ergun Caner, as seen in the videos posted below. No amount of deceit on Caner’s part is going to cleanse the net of his lies, and since we had never reviewed that particular presentation, it was very easy to find “misstatement” after misstatement,