Alpha and Omega Ministries is a Christian apologetics organization based in Phoenix, Arizona. James White, director, is a professor, having taught Greek, Systematic Theology, and various topics in the field of apologetics for numerous schools.
Textual Criticism and the TR Live from CBTS
Rich Pierce, , Church History, Exegesis, General Apologetics, King James Onlyism, Textual Issues, The Dividing LineLive From Covenant Baptist Theological Seminary James discusses the issues surrounding the idea of Textual Criticism and the Textus Receptus. Here is the YouTube link: Live Video Stream The Dividing Line is on YouTube video. Our YouTube channel also provides videos of most of the debates that Dr. White has done over the years. Take some time and browse it
A Colorful Response to The King James Only Controversy Falls Way Short – James White Responds to Dr. Thomas Holland
James White, , King James OnlyismThere have been only a few responses to my book, The King James Only Controversy. Aside from one privately written and published response by Dr. Kirk DiVietro (my reply), and Dr. Ruckman’s wild-eyed articles in the Bible Believer’s Bulletin (which, as I understand it, ended up in a “book” as well), there has been little in the way of substantive
Yes, Lillibell, We Did Another Radio Free Geneva, and It Was Two Hours Long!
James White, , Church History, Debate, King James Onlyism, Personal, Provisionism, Radio Free Geneva, Reformed Apologetics, Roman Catholicism, Textual Issues, The Dividing LineWell, it was actually OVER two hours long, and I still did not finish up, but we made good progress. First I responded to Evangelist Ted Alexander’s comments wherein he not only identified Reformed theology as fundamentally Roman Catholic, but said I am a Catholic, and a plant in the church, etc. and etc. So, we demonstrated he is suffering
Response to Southwestern on King James Controversy, Part 6 (Letus / Erhman)
James White, , King James Onlyism, The Dividing LineDr. Letus also accused Dr. White of being ignorant of Bart Erhman’s work on textual criticism, but Letus neglected to mention the liberal presuppositions of Erhman, as well as how often Erhman’s scholarly conclusions refute KJOnlyism. Also, some new information on Dr. Letus’s background comes to light. Caller asks how much responsibility we have to correct those that reject the
A Steve Hays Face-Plant, Closer Look at Texts like 1 John 3:1, A Tad of Steven Anderson, Four Phone Calls
James White, , Exegesis, General Apologetics, King James Onlyism, Open Theism, Reformed Apologetics, Reformed Baptist Issues, Roman Catholicism, Textual Issues, The Dividing LineLooked at a few topics to start out, including a short hit piece from Steve Hays that missed the mark by a mile. Then we did a little more TC reasoning looking at another claim from the TT’s that doing modern textual criticism is unbiblical, and then moved on to a few more quotes from Steven Anderson in response to
New Age Bible Versions Refuted Part II
James White, , King James OnlyismContinued from Part I In Conclusion…. It is not joyous to have to engage in the kind of task that requires you to dwell upon mistakes, errant conclusions, and mis-citations. I would much rather take my time to speak of the wonders of God’s providence in preserving His Word through the centuries, not in the way the KJV Only folks
A New Open Phones Format Show!
James White, , CBGM, Christian Worldview, Church Fathers, Church History, Debate, Eastern Orthodoxy, Exegesis, General Apologetics, Gospel/Jesus Studies, Islam, King James Onlyism, Personal, Post-Evangelicalism, Reformed Apologetics, Road Trip, Roman Catholicism, Textual Issues, The Dividing Line, Theology MattersWell, let me tell you, Rich is one happy camper. He got the bright idea today, really only a few hours before we started, to use Zoom to allow folks to call in to the program today. And…it worked. So I started off with about 20 minutes or so in response to a King James Only advocate giving a completely
Apologizing for the Bible, Textual Critical Issues and the TR
James White, , CBGM, Debate, Eastern Orthodoxy, King James Onlyism, Personal, Post-Evangelicalism, Textual Issues, The Dividing Line, TROnlyismBack in the regular studio today. Started off with a personal response to Andy Stanley on his apologizing for Christians seeking to apply “Christian rules” to non-Christians, and then looked a bit at Reuben Swanson’s books on the text of the NT (in reference to Thomas Ross’ use thereof), finishing with a read-through of Brett Mahlen’s chapter on why he
Archives
Recent Posts
Categories
- Abortion
- Atheism
- Baptism
- Blog Stuff
- CBGM
- Christian Worldview
- Church Fathers
- Church History
- Debate
- DL Shorts
- Eastern Orthodoxy
- Eschatology
- Exegesis
- Federal Vision
- General Apologetics
- Godly Disciplines
- Gospel/Jesus Studies
- Hebrew Israelism
- Homosexuality
- Iglesia Ni Christo
- Islam
- Jehovah's Witnesses
- John Owen
- Ken Wilson
- King James Onlyism
- Mail Bag
- Misc
- Molinism
- Mormonism
- Musings
- New Perspectivism
- Offense
- Oneness Pentecostalism
- Open Phones
- Open Theism
- Pastoral Theology
- Pauline Studies
- Persecution
- Personal
- Post-Evangelicalism
- Provisionism
- Racialism
- Radio Free Geneva
- Reformed Apologetics
- Reformed Baptist Issues
- Resources
- Road Trip
- Roman Catholicism
- Simply Silly
- Speaking Engagements
- Sweater Vest Dialogues
- Technology
- Testimonies
- Textual Issues
- The Dividing Line
- Theology Matters
- Thomism
- Tomb Issues
- Transinsanity
- TROnlyism
- Uncategorized
- Unitarianism