On 3/26 I posted a response to an article on John 6. The authors have replied, in a sense, here. I say in a sense because in essence the entire reply is a defense of using their unique dispensational construct to avoid the grammatical and syntactical problems with their interpretation. Evidently, they believe their over-all system trumps the details of the text. Since those specific exegetical errors are not even addressed in the reply, we once again have another documented instance of “John 6 vs. Tradition.”

©2022 Alpha and Omega Ministries. All Rights Reserved.

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?