Islamic Anachronism

   Shadid Lewis and Sami Zaatari have been commenting on my last video, and they have stated that we should watch the video to see what they really said. In fact, it has been suggested that I am being dishonest in my comments. So, I happen to have video from sections of both debates on my little digital camera (seems like

   I have begun reviewing Ali Ataie’s article, Can Paul Be Trusted? I provided his conclusions first just to give the reader a good taste of the kind of conclusions arrived at by Islamic writers. We continue examining Mr. Ataie’s assertions and arguments. Paul’s revolutionary view of Jesus’ crucifixion and its redemptive value as well as his doctrine of original and

James Bentley uses very poor, or at the least, misleading language, in his description of the text of a. He writes, “Persistently and disturbingly, the codex from Mount Sinai omits cherished sentences of Holy Scripture. In Matthew chapter 17, the disciples of Jesus fail to cast out a devil from an epileptic. Verse 21 in the received text gives Jesus’s

So said Tertullian during the Roman persecutions of the church long ago. There are still martyrs today, and Islam is busy making them. You probably won’t hear about this on the news. They are far too busy with other things.

The pictures do speak for themselves. Where is the counter demonstration from the “majority of peaceful Muslims”?           And I see the State Department of the United States has also condemned the cartoons…could someone link me to where they condemn the blasting of Christianity, the Bible, Jesus Christ, etc., that takes place daily in almost all of our newspapers?