A Compelling Oneness Argument

A couple of points regarding your commentary on Ignatius. I find your arguments on Ignatius’ conception of the Eucharist to be very poor and entirely unconvincing.    I’m sorry to hear that, but, since I provided extensive background information, put his statement in the context provided by his own pen, and you refuse to allow for that, who is actually guilty

Dear Sir…I’m writing to inform you that, first off, you’re a liar. Perhaps that is too strong a word. Maybe you are just too stupid to check your facts before publishing something so blatantly wrong and misdirected. Let me first correct you by saying Geron Davis & Kindred Souls were not the group that led in worship at the event

I have no questions, only a couple of comments. Dave Hunt’s book, “What Love is This?”, is excellent, clear, and for the most part fairly concise. I fail to understand why you spent so much time in you lengthy “Open Letter to Dave Hunt”, when he is so clearly correct. The entire issue of Unconditional Election encompasses, promotes, and fosters

1 John 2:20 But you have an anointing from the Holy One, and you know all things. – Anointing is done with oil and the laying on of hands. Only in confirmation have I seen this come to pass. This is a physical transferance of a grace promised by God, 1 John 2:27 But the anointing which you have received

Dr. White, After reading a few articles on your site about Catholicism, I have decided that your anti-Cahtolic bigotry has clouded your reasoning. You reject Church authority for the interpretation of scripture, yet on what basis do you determine what Scripture teaches? Your own? Like Luther, you have allowed your ego and bias to determine what scripture says, layering it

4) First, it is a very long stretch to identify the position of Shebna/Eliakim as a definitional characteristic of the Davidic kingdom. The reference is post-Davidic to begin with: can something that cannot be traced to David be definitional of the Davidic kingdom? Next, there is no indication that this is a divine institution. Further, not only is Shebna removed

“if any man thirsts let him come unto me and drink.” You really expect us to believe that God is talking to regenerate men here because it is only they who can thirst spiritually speaking?.Come now James if this is yor best answer then your pretty desperate. Your pulling the cart before the horse…assuming calvinistic dogma before it has been

Dear James, In spite of Hank’s best efforts to gang up on you, you (through Scripture) smashed George Bryson’s reasoning. I was amazed at his lack of understanding of the Bible and his refusal to address Genesis 50:20, his explaining away Rom. 8:7,8 with a “you don’t need to see my papers” (Star Wars reference) smokescreen, etc. I hate that