Introduction to the Views of John Crossan

   This morning I was on David Wheaton’s Christian Worldview program discussing the Ehrman debate and related issues. I sounded like Barry White instead of James White, but hopefully it was helpful.    I just finished the galley proofs of the 2nd edition of The King James Only Controversy. That means we should be seeing the new editions of both that book

“I would fight and die for a Muslim’s right to build a mosque in every city in America.” That’s a line taken from what Caner’s website in 2005 described this way: He debated Michael Moore in a nationally syndicated column entitled “Hatriotism.” I found what appears to be the colorful column (part 1)(part 2). The article is critical of Michael

I’ve listened to the entire 3 hour debate between James White and Roger Perkins. I’ve also read Mr. Perkins latest rant on the subject (one of the more amusing lines from that screed: “Now, you are very, very wrong about my knowledge of the Greek language and I have written entire symposium papers about how to read lexicons.”). Less amusing

We have heard so much of the angry “friends of Ergun” that I feel it would be well to let others speak. No names, just the heartfelt expressions of brothers and sisters who see what is important and are just as amazed as I am at the games being played about a serious subject. I wanted to send you this

   Looks like the blog flood has subsided a bit! Wore TQuid and cds and DV out, I do believe! By the way, I wanted to especially thank cds for that tremendous series on Qadar. If you missed it, head for the March archive and make sure you catch up! Speaking of that, I have been playing catch-up on “real life”

Yep, the infallible Church alright. (I know, I know, “Oh, those are just local bishops!”).

Now, I have criticized, strongly, the apologetic methodology of William Lane Craig. I would debate Dawkins quite differently than Craig would. But that aside, it is fascinating to observe the level of hubris, simple personal self-deception and arrogance, that defines Richard Dawkins as a human being who has dedicated his every moment of existence to his leadership of, and membership