April 13, 2006

Woops, forgot to provide the link to yesterday’s DL! My apologies. Played clips from Tim Staples once again proving he functions on the basis of sola ecclesia and also noting the fact that Rome’s apologists do not tend to worry themselves about advancing and improving their apologetic arguments, then a clip from Dr. Davis on Acts 13:48 and how tradition

Finished off 4.5 hours of live DL’s this week with another 90 minute edition. This time I broke it into three half-hour segments. First segment finished off the lengthy e-mail to which I dedicated a total of 2 hours of response. The second segment continued our examination of the Fernandes/Comis debate, continuing our response to Dr. Fernandes’ opening statement. The

Started off reading parts of this article, commented on the King of the Blogosphere, centuri0n, giving me a Wooden Nickel Award for being the Meanest Calvinist on the Net, then continued working on the Ehrman NPR materials and more of Ahmed Deedat, this time from his debate with Shorrosh. One call included questions on dichotomy vs. trichotomy and who should

I started off today’s program with a brief recap of the debate from Newberg, and Dan Barker’s continued damage control campaign. Moved fairly quickly on to the comments of Chuck Smith and his co-hosts on the “Pastor’s Perspective” radio program, as found here. This just under five minute clip is a study in shallow eisegesis. It is incredible that these

I haven’t a clue what we did on the DL last Thursday other than “we finished Brian’s call and took a bunch of calls ourselves.” Oh, I remember the last one was one of those “what did you mean in this contextless article from 25 years ago” situations that always frustrates me. But anyway, I think the calls were good