December 28, 2005

I actually chose to start off with my continued response to Bashir Vania’s comments because we were in a section that has high apologetic value, which covered the first 45 minutes. Then we opened the phones, and my, the range of topics was vast! Adam and I sat around yammering about OT textual criticism for a while (at least I

Started off shaking my head about the amazing thuggery of the radical leftists in our culture who can get away with attacking Brad Pitt’s mother for daring to have an opinion other than their own. Then we moved into a brief discussion of the seemingly genetic inconsistency of the leading Islamic apologists today and their fascination with liberal scholarship–at least,

Well, you can see now what our major announcement was, and I’m truly excited about it. I took the first half hour to make the announcement and play some comments from Shabir on the issue (there are a number of his presentations on the topic available on line at places like YouTube). Then, in the second half hour, I may

Did a little over an hour in response to Gail Riplinger’s childish, insult-filled revision of history regarding our 1993 encounter on KRDS Radio in Phoenix.  Played clips from that encounter, along with clips from the Ankerberg Show and other venues.  Moved on from there to announce an upcoming discussion between myself and Dr. Michael Brown on Job 23:13-14 and the

First DL since Ergun Caner blocked me from following his insights on Twitter. I played a clip of him claiming that he has a standing rule to debate anyone, anywhere, any time. Then I briefly commented on John Shelby Spong’s new manifesto in which he claims his side has won the homosexual debate, so, there’s no reason to debate it