Discussion on “Neo-Pop-Arminianism” of James Barker in Debate with James White

Well, the Cox guy comes out, says we should be fixed up, and…boom, five minutes before the DL, once again, we are dead in the water. Thankfully, the Cox guy was just leaving. He can’t find anything wrong here, so this is all in the “main office,” but he isn’t getting anywhere with them, either. Somebody is playing games anyway.

Well, evidently, I answered all possible questions on textual criticism, or, bored the world to death with that series, so we moved on to listening, sort of on the fly, to last weekend’s sermon by Johnny Hunt in which he once again did the “here’s the template, we are all going to keep repeating this, without modification, without accuracy, and

Did a Jumbo edition early today, as I fly to Toronto tomorrow, and needed to get in an “extended study session” in the afternoon. Tackled some items relating to the politics in the apologetics realm, then continued my response to Adnan Rashid’s comments in a February debate, and then switched over the Bart Ehrman from October of 2011. Remember, no

Started off reading a certified letter that was sent to me from Green Bay, Wisconsin. Very insightful. Then discussed George Bryson’s article (noted on the blog earlier), then got into playing the key portions of last Saturday’s Unbelievable program from London, where Justin Brierley had on Bart Ehrman and Mike Licona. Another important examination of how Christian truth can be

We had some server problems that got us going a bit late, but we pressed on anyway with a discussion of Roman Catholic priests and a review of some comments on the Eucharist. Here’s the slightly shorted (53 minute) program.