Finishing the Textual Critical Series

I reported on the Barker debate, played my closing statement, and then discussed issues relating to the vast complexity of life and how naturalistic materialists struggle bravely to hold back the tide of evidence that threatens to overwhelm them.

For years Manuel Culwell has called the Dividing Line. Most of the time, in the past, when we have tried to dialogue, things went south…quickly.  Then, a few months ago, we had a fairly controlled discussion, so I suggested then that at some point we choose some texts and discuss them.  Well, it took a while, but today Manuel called

Had a ton of articles in Evernote to catch up on, including a bunch the continued crusade of the LGBT revisionists to demand Christianity change its fundamental beliefs so that they can feel better, and the fundamental degradation of our culture in promoting human autonomy (hmm—isn’t that a theological issue too?).  Then I moved on to some interactions with Roman

The entire program today was a review of comments made by Marcus Borg and NT Wright specifically about issues such as historicity, worldviews, Q, and the like. Here’s the program.

We did another Jumbo DL, covering our three debates, and making good progress toward finishing the Fernandes/Comis debate! Sorry about being slow in getting it blogged, as I left right after the program and just now got back home. Remember, the format for the shows is always the same, so you do not need to wait for me to blog