June 11, 2009

We will dedicate thirty minutes to the Fernandes/Comis debate, thirty minutes to the Perkins/Slick debate, and thirty minutes to your phone calls on another Jumbo DL tomorrow!

Today on the DL we did “Crossan 101,” an introduction, mainly in his own words, to the thought of John Dominic Crossan. Using clips from previous debates I sought to explain the presuppositions upon which he functions, and how our debate in August is going to be just a tad bit on the challenging side. Here’s the program.

Went a little long today because I had a lot to cover. First, Neil from Toronto called to give us a quick review of the Hunt/Ally debate from last Friday. Then I launched into Steve Ray’s now completely documented dishonesty, and his promotion of William Albrecht’s video responses to my series on Ignatius. So I reviewed Ray’s blog article (noted

So what prompted me to do a Radio Free Geneva? Well, first, the clips from the Ankerberg Show with Norman Geisler and his dismissal of the utter refutation of his horrific “farmer and the boys in the swimming pond” illustration (and the misquotation of Matthew 23:37 as well). But after spending the first half hour on that topic, I moved