March 23, 2004

As I mentioned to the all-knowing Algo, I thought about blogging last Thursday’s DL, and evidently, that was enough, since I then did not do so. So, we continued our response to Sheikh Awal, and took one call on the Caner scandal. Here’s the program.

This morning’s regular edition of The Dividing Line should, Lord willing, make its appearance tomorrow, same time. It is physically impossible for only one person to do the program and run the electronics that are located in a different location, so, we will do our best to continue with our Ehrman response, possibly throw in some Ahmed Deedat material, etc.,

Today on the DL I made note of at least the majority of works we will be reading for The Cross: Theology and Historicity class on the cruise in October, and then replied a second time to a Roman Catholic correspondent. Then we went back to the Catholic Answers Live presentation on the “twin pillars” of Protestantism.

Well, you won’t be laughing your way through today’s 90 minute DL, that’s for sure. Started off with the jihadi attack in London—and I think some folks will not be happy with where I ended up on that one, challenging us to think about our own hearts in light of those events. But then we moved from that into the

Reviewed Adrian Rogers’ exposition of Romans 9 from his series through the book of Romans, with audio clips.