Road Trip Dividing Line: Eric Holmberg’s Conversion Syndrome, Joel Beeke on the KJV

Before diving back into Sheikh Awal’s opening statement I very briefly responded to yet another “Hey, let’s repeat every tired and silly argument against James White” thread on the Catholic Answers Forums. Also, we went over Norman Geisler’s less than unbiased (and still not really comprehensible) commentary on the Caner scandal. Then spent most of our time responding to Sheikh

Started off with a few cultural items, such as the arrest of the founder of the totally misnamed “Human Rights Campaign,” but then moved to a response to me written by Derek Frank, which took up the rest of the program with issues such as Israel, the church, and the confusion brought into this topic by claims of revelation, words

Gave a quick review of my time in New Jersey and New York, then moved on to reading portions of David Gushee’s new book explaining his new found support of homosexualism in the church, and then finished up with some more examination of Austin Fischer’s comments in the Calvinism debate earlier this year. Here is the YouTube link:

Started off with a bit of a discussion about apologetic and cultural presuppositions, and then went to the phones. First caller out of the box was James, a Roman Catholic, who clearly had a particular formulaic approach he has used to attempt to show Protestants the errors of their ways. We went back and forth for 25 minutes, and the

The first hour was a hodge-podge of topics related to synergism, including a video from Michael Brown on whether we can lose our salvation, material from SBCToday (i.e., the “Traditionalists), etc.  Then we talked for a few minutes about Robert Morey, debates, and the infamous “thing/thigh” hadith. Here is the YouTube link:

Nice to have had internet connectivity during the entirety of the Dividing Line today, that’s for sure. Finished up the Harris rebuttal in the recent (expensive) debate from Notre Dame, then listened to Norman Geisler on a national radio program dodge a clear question focused upon the incoherence of his views of divine sovereignty, and then addressed an e-mail about

Well, despite corresponding with Nadir Ahmed and letting him know that he would be treated fairly as a caller on the program, evidently, unless we arrange a full debate with him, he won’t call in. Oh well, we tried. We had a nice Muslim come into channel a few hours before the program, with whom we had a good conversation.