September 13, 2011

For the first half hour we played Hank Hanegraaff’s comments in which he said I twist people’s words to make them say the opposite of what they actually intended, and responded.  In the second we read through part of Jonathan Merritt’s defense of Jen Hatmaker and once again wrestled with the issues that compromising Evangelicalism presents to us today. Here

Started with some discussion about the text of the New Testament again, took a call, and then, at the break, Darrin, the atheist I talked a bit about a few weeks ago, who had written to William Lane Craig, called in. We went about ten minutes long so we could talk.

A bit of an odd DL today. I needed to use the first ten minutes or so to respond to some questions I had received about some comments I made on Isaiah 44:24 here. A JW apologist cited my comments, so I needed to provide a response.     After that I very quickly read the 14th chapter of Catholic Answers’

Did not even bother trying to make a transition between the two halves of today’s program. Started off with a discussion of Islam and eventually the reading of a few “hadith Qudsi,” all of which I explained on the program. Then switched over to a response to yesterday’s attempted response by Peter Lumpkins, taking the opportunity to go a little