September 28, 2004

For those of you who have been writing and saying, “Look, come on, can you find a meaningful Arminian to debate, that Hunt encounter, though useful in responding to the common, but uninformed and shallow objections to Calvinism, was hardly a fair fight” may find this utterly amazing, but it is true: Dave Hunt thinks he proved his points in

We lost our server for the first 14 minutes, but ol’ got us back up and running. Pierre, our LDS listener, called in, prompted once again to defend our Arminian friends by yesterday’s program responding to Dr. O’Guin’s attack on “Calvinism.” Always interesting to listen to a discussion with Pierre on soteriological issues, always coming back to sola scriptura.

Going to start at 3:30pm MST today instead of 4 to fit the full 90 minutes in before 5pm. Will finish up my review and rebuttal of Laurence Brown’s “scholarly” attacks upon the Trinity and the Sonship of Jesus, and try to get back to Abdullah Kunde and Roger Perkins. Join us!

Benny Diaz hosts and shares a summary of the ministry, from its origins in outreach to the LDS witht he gospel, as it has expanded to apologetics to other cults and Roman Catholics. He also interviews pastor John on Reformed Baptist History, marks of a true church, church discipline, and church governance.

I had simply wanted to play the debate into the DL feed, but when I saw Chris Pinto’s spin article this morning (the first thing I was appraised of upon arising) I felt it appropriate to respond, which I did for the first about 35 minutes of the program.  Then I played the entire debate.  Enjoy! Here is the YouTube