Gene Robinson

As promised, I began my review of the interview with Frank Beckwith today, even extending the program by ten minutes. I likewise responded to the “Yes, I had read Trent, even though my comments would lead any reasonable person to think I had not” issue as well. I am half way through the interview, but more than halfway through the

Our ISP is having a hard day today. We lose our connectivity every few minutes, and maintain it only erratically. So, that may impact the DL this afternoon. Right now, we, just like the God of Open Theism, do not know what the future holds. So if you try connecting up at 4pm MST and there’s nothing there, you’ll know

   Spent the whole hour reviewing the next portion of the debate from 2002, looking for that elusive evidence of how “painfully obviously” the arguments against Rome’s position are unbiblical and incoherent.

Woops, forgot to provide the link to yesterday’s DL! My apologies. Played clips from Tim Staples once again proving he functions on the basis of sola ecclesia and also noting the fact that Rome’s apologists do not tend to worry themselves about advancing and improving their apologetic arguments, then a clip from Dr. Davis on Acts 13:48 and how tradition