A Portion of My First Rebuttal Period in the Debate with Jalal Abualrub

It’s been a few weeks since my last installment in this series. As you can see, I’ve been a bit busy with other topics. As we return to the lengthy quotation from Bentley on a, we recall that we have already documented the less-than-accurate perspective offered by Bentley (which is probably why our Muslim authors chose this citation). This continues

Think about it: Secularists, such as those in charge of the United States government, will gladly engage in religious persecution and favoritism in the interests of “the state.” Pray that God will have mercy and give His people freedom to preach the Gospel to His glory.

Single camera shoot, but hey, even the audio would be better than my little pen-derived mp3. Anyone notice I’ve been growing out my goatee? It’s so bright it helps with reading in low light. OK, not really.

The next variant in a noted by Bentley and repeated by Saifullah and Azmy is found by comparing Luke 15:19 with vs. 21. Bentley claims, “Now the delightful change in later manuscripts is that the son, himself so unexpectedly welcomed by his father, prudently omits to offer himself as a hired servant!” Delightful? In any case, there is a fair

I was thinking after posting the information about Caner’s endorsement disappearing from the Siljander website…what if this had nothing to do with Caner? What if someone contacted Mark Siljander, provided him with the mountain of documentation proving that everything Cal Thomas said about Caner, as recorded in the book, is bogus (born and raised in Turkey, came here to convert

   Please note: the doctrine of the Trinity does not involve “shirk.” If Muslims would just understand the doctrine correctly (i.e., if they could break out of the errors forced upon them by the ignorance of Muhammad who simply did not understand the doctrine), they would realize that we are monotheists and we are not in any way “associating” separate “gods”

Omar Qayum is a volunteer at the North American Muslim Foundation (NAMF). Today he posted an article on the MDI blog taking issue with various events in Canada. I read through the article over lunch, and just about choked on my pasta when I ran across this section in response to Roman Catholic Michael Coren: I challenge Michael to refute