The Deen Show MailBag on the Trinity

I had not intended to utilize this material. I commented on what brought this “discussion” about right after it took place, here. This morning Mr. Gulam posted on our Facebook page a question. He asked why I was “hiding” our “debate.” Well, this isn’t a debate, of course, and we have been hiding nothing. I was given the DVD of

We close out this brief series–one I have found particularly interesting personally, especially in light of the uncritical use of scholarship by the wide spectrum of Islamic apologists–with a discussion of the final element of the “argument” borrowed from Bart Ehrman by Abdullah, cited last week, that regarding Theodore of Mopsuestia. Citations of early Christian writers are notoriously popular on

MuslimByChoice, a channel on YouTube, often attempts to respond to my materials. Unfortunately, he (they?) have provided far too many examples of bad argumentation, poor research, and simply erroneous reasoning. Here is an attempt to respond to only a tiny portion of my opening remarks from last week in Toronto.

We have noted this before, and when the guys at Acts 17 reposted it just now, I thought I would comment again. There is something deeply disrespectful in Ehrman’s comments here. Oh, I’m sure he was just trying to be funny, in a way. But remember when I asked him serious questions about his methodology and his conclusions as they

The following appeared in the San Diego Union-Tribune Wed., July 13th. You probably didn’t hear much about this in the mainstream media. You should have. The article is by Toby Sterling, Associated Press. AMSTERDAM, Netherlands — The Muslim extremist on trial for the slaying of filmmaker Theo van Gogh confessed yesterday, saying he was driven by religious conviction. “I don’t

James White Debates Bashir Varnia on the Crucifixion of Christ VENUE :NUR -UL ISLAM AUDITORIUM ADDRESS: CORNER GIRAFFE AND NYALA AVE EXT, 5 LENASIA, SOUTH AFRICA TIME: 8 PM

   I have begun reviewing Ali Ataie’s article, Can Paul Be Trusted? I provided his conclusions first just to give the reader a good taste of the kind of conclusions arrived at by Islamic writers. We continue examining Mr. Ataie’s assertions and arguments. Paul’s revolutionary view of Jesus’ crucifixion and its redemptive value as well as his doctrine of original and