Gail Riplinger on KRDS Radio from 1993, Part II

I am going to press on with the Fernandes/Comis debate, and the Slick/Perkins debate, of course, but…I wanted to respond to some recently posted attacks (they are not critiques—when you call someone a liar, and engage in constant ad-hominem argumentation, that is not a critique) by King James Only advocate Will Kinney. Specifically, I will be responding to the following

I did a little looking around the net for materials by Dr. Stauffer, and very quickly ran across this article. And it took just a moment to read this: The Codex Vaticanus (discovered in the Pope’s library in 1481) and Sinaiticus (discovered in 1859 in a trash can at St. Catherine’s monastery on Mt. Sinai) were the two texts that

Daniel Wallace wrote an article clearing up perennial confused renderings in the King James Version of the Bible. He concludes, “ have misread a transliteration as though it were a proper name, then assumed that the underlying Hebrew text meant Lucifer, embracing the false conclusion that calling the king ‘the morning star’ in Isa 14.12 and Christ the ‘morning star’

Nine years ago now a panel discussion featuring three KJV Only advocates (Sam Gipp, Joe Chambers, and Thomas Strouse) and five non-KJV Only advocates (Dan Wallace, Don Wilkins, Art Farstad, Ken Barker, and myself) was recorded in the studios of the John Ankerberg Show. During the taping of the 4th episode, a complete non-event took place that I knew, given

   In the brief citation from Pulpit Crimes posted below I made a very quick comment about the rendering of the KJV at I Timothy 6:10. Here is what I had written on the text a dozen years ago now in The King James Only Controversy: The Root or A Root?    Another favorite passage of KJV Only adherents is found in