1 John 5:1, Exegesis, Regeneration and Saving Faith, and Brian Brodersen

Tim Enloe says he’s not going to respond, and then he responded. In part: So go ahead, Dr. White. Blog some more about my “discontent with truth”. You’re only preaching to a very narrow choir. Which is, of course, exactly how your very narrow, very much Donatist-like theological tradition likes it. For those not familiar with the digs used

   “Unless you impute human-like irrationality to God, I will call you names.” This seems to be the attitude of many squeamish Calvinists on the net these days. Unless you are willing to drag God down to the level of a flummoxed suitor, who is torn between contradictory desires, you will be called to repent and labeled with terms meant only

A few years ago Lane Chaplin put this “debate” together, and since someone just popped into channel and made reference to it (he was freaking out about the advertisement that plays beforehand—for him, it was for Scientology. These are random ads—mine was for Mormonism!). Remember, at this point, we were scheduled to debate at Liberty in October of 2006, a

I am in St. Louis, rushing to finish a lengthy presentation on Bart Ehrman’s main arguments against New Testament reliability, but I wanted to VERY quickly link to this article. Here someone (I do not know who, and to be honest, I do not care who–just somebody named “Steve”) demonstrates that rational and fair thinking is not necessarily a part