July 12, 2005

As the video I posted earlier documents, I took the first quarter of the program to discuss Steven Anderson of “I Hate Barak O’Bama” fame, then took some calls and played more of William Lane Craig’s defense of Arminianism.

Started off briefly noting Peter Lumpkins’ absence (fully expected of course), then took some quick calls on a wide variety of topics, including a discussion of the high priestly work of Christ and an upcoming debate with atheists. I then moved into reading a large portion of chapter 4 of Love Wins, illustrating the man-centeredness of the Arminian fundamentalism that

One looking for issues with Dr. Hahn’s book find a “target rich environment”, with its dubious reliance on typological interpretation as opposed to actual historical or biblical data on Mary. Dr. White also tells a story from Hahn’s biographical background that may help explain Hahn’s bias when he comes to interpretation.

“It seems to me that what Dr. Silverman ought to do tonight is he ought to become a Christian who doesn’t believe in Biblical inerrancy. That would be a perfectly consistent conclusion for him to draw as a result of tonight’s debate. That God exists, that He has revealed Himself in Christ, but he’s not ready yet to believe in