Debate: The Papacy, With Robert Zins vs. Scott Butler and Robert Sungenis, Boston College, Boston MA, 7/25/1995

I just read through this thread, and once again, I am simply left speechless. Obviously, what we do in apologetics just isn’t intended for most of these folks. Put on your asbestos gloves prior to clicking this URL, and thanks to the couple of non-Catholics who took the time to say, “Uh, wait a minute, that’s just silly….” BTW, to

   Since I have found another response to my “ten questions” list on line, I will abbreviate the rest of my reply to our catholic convert that I began a few days ago so that I can try to wrap up some of this current Roman Catholic topic and get focused upon other issues in my studies and here on the

   What do you do when documentation is provided that you have clearly, repeatedly promoted falsehood in defense of your faith? The honest man admits his mistake. But the politician spins the facts. “Oh, I didn’t mean it that way.” “But you said….” “Let’s not be focused on the past!” We see it every day as politicians demonstrate that truth is

   Here was a thread that caught my eye on the Catholic Answers forums:    “I was looking at Philip Porvaznik’s (“Philvaz”) website and saw an interesting quote from protestant apologist William Webster and David king in their book “The Holy Scripture: Pillar and Foundation of our faith”     ” The patristic evidence for sola Scriptura is, we believe, an overwhelming indictment