August 3, 2004

   I am very pleased to have as my guests on The Dividing Line this coming Tuesday morning, 11am MST, Dr. Sam Waldron and Pastor Richard Barcellos. If you do almost any reading in things Reformed Baptist you know both names immediately. Both brothers are a part of the expanding work of The Midwest Center for Theological Studies. Both are authors

I really thought that I would be able to easily get through the rest of the video from Adnan Rashid and Hamza Tzortzis today—I still have nearly five minutes left to cover tomorrow!  But, we got into a lot of important stuff, including the canon of Scripture.  I made reference to the lectures by Dr. Michael Kruger (found here).  Lots

Covered a wide range of topics today, such as: Psalm 36:4 and the need to despise evil; the growing evidence that the “Gospel of Jesus’ Wife” fragment is a modern day fraud; the fundamentalist, non-reflective secularism of Adam Gopnik; Paul Williams’ love affair with the nuttiest of history and theology; more examples of how intolerant those of the left are

Since I did not get to my “South Africa trip preparation materials” on yesterday’s very long Dividing Line, I promised to get to it today, on a special Radio Free Damascus Friday program. Finished up Bashir Vania’s opening statement, and then started into Yusuf Ismail’s comments. Did not get too far as we needed to unpack a lot of background

In this episode, James has a dialog with a Mormon about Calvinism. James covers many scriptures and refutes many misconceptions in this dialogue.

Did a little over an hour in response to Gail Riplinger’s childish, insult-filled revision of history regarding our 1993 encounter on KRDS Radio in Phoenix.  Played clips from that encounter, along with clips from the Ankerberg Show and other venues.  Moved on from there to announce an upcoming discussion between myself and Dr. Michael Brown on Job 23:13-14 and the

While some of Dave Hunt’s apologetics work makes good points, on this issue he agrees with Rome, and follows Norman Geisler on rebranding synergism as a soteriological middle path. Its attack on Irresistible Grace does not deal with a typical representation of Reformed theology, but takes some biblical passages out of context.