Cross Examination with Shabir Ally, Monday in London

You know how you get into studying a subject, run across a gem in a footnote, a bibliographical entry, etc., and end up finding something really valuable? Well, I sort of feel like that right now, as I ran across some “leads” in my on-going study of the wide, wide topic of Islam, and not wishing to miss out on

Dan Wallace posted a very interesting article responding to this video wherein Walid Shoebat alleges that Codex Vaticanus (B) identifies the mark of the beast not as “666” (or 616 as some earlier manuscripts have) but instead an Arabic insertion “in the name of Allah” along with a symbol of crossed swords. I will not repeat Dan’s refutation here, but

Let’s inject just a little truth into the discussion of John 20:28 before looking at the amazing claims of Islam’s apologists and then trace them back to their source in Bart Ehrman. The meaning of this text has been clearly understood from the start. Only a tremendous prejudice and bias could cause any person to miss the intention of John,