https://youtu.be/LNuChQUsIMU
https://youtu.be/IuEhodbM-Mk
A jury Friday acquitted four Christian missionaries who were accused of inciting a crowd while videotaping themselves proselytizing to Muslims at the Dearborn Arab International Festival in June. Nabeel Qureshi of Virginia, Negeen Mayel of California, and Paul Rezkalla and David Wood, both of New York, were acquitted of breach of peace, 19th District Court officials in Dearborn said after
The debate will take place live, via Skype, at 8pm EDT. You can watch live here. Watch, and pray!
Someone really needs to challenge the use of “Veritas” for these gatherings. Meanwhile, the gospel keeps getting trampled under foot by the Great Evangelical Cover Up. Note the assertion of Mr. Khan that Christians “fear” people becoming Muslims in this new video exposing more of Ergun Caner’s fundamental ignorance of the very field he is viewed as the leading expert
Another video has been posted with embarrassing statements from Ergun Caner regarding his fundamental misunderstandings of basic Islamic terminology and concepts. Spent a few minutes at the top of the show reviewing that, then listened to a portion of an Unbelievable radio show from London where a Christian, in speaking to an atheist, offered a horrific presentation of the gospel,
Over at Called to Communion, in the comment box, Bryan Cross wrote: In the first century, no one needed to confess that Christ is homoousious with the Father. But after the fourth century, to deny the homoousious is to fall into heresy. This is dead wrong and gets things exactly backwards. It has always been heresy to
Randy wrote: Regarding today’s Dividing Line, you *do* use “Anti-Calvinist” quite a bit, along with “Anti-Trinitarian,” and “Anti-Reformed” rather than calling them by their “postive” terms. So, stay consistent as to whether people should be defined by what they are positively (Arminian, Oneness believers) or whether it’s fair game for folks to call each other Anti- whatever. Because, you do
I think that is the longest title to a DL blog entry I’ve ever produced! We started off looking at Robert Sungenis’ comments in response to TurretinFan’s article on the Immaculate Conception debate with Christopher Ferrara. I must say, Dr. Sungenis was very nice to talk to and debate in Santa Fe. He should be commended. But this article left
On Friday, September 10, Dr. White debated Roman Catholic apologist Robert Sungenis on the assumption of Mary. Dr White Discussed this debate on Iron Sharpens Iron. You can listen to it here. Other recent ISI shows: Jamin Hubner: The Atheist vs. Christian Debate on ‘Is the New Testament Evil’: One Christian’s Analysis TurretinFan: The Debate on the Immaculate Conception &
First, I will be on Iron Sharpens Iron to discuss my debates with Robert Sungenis in about forty minutes (8PM EDT). http://sharpens.blogspot.com. Second, I forgot to let folks know about a sermon I delivered on a biblically-based doctrine of the believer’s security in Christ while in Santa Fe. It is not your normal sermon on the topic, but, I think
I am currently reading Biblical Theology in the Life of the Church for fun, but also in preparation for (Lord willing) pastoral ministry. What I’ve read so far I am really enjoying, with one exception. I do not understand why some theologians, when speaking of covenants, buy in to Meredith Kline’s view. It bothers me that when Michael Lawrence writes
I was pondering a statement I saw this morning from William Lane Craig. It represents the form of apologetics that is based upon non-Reformed theology and soteriology in particular. It is, without a doubt, far more “popular” than the methodology I am committed to. The statement contains truth, but it is placed within a matrix of sub-biblical thinking. Here it
There seems to be a new conversion story every day of a lost Protestant finding his way across the Tiber. Based on these testimonies, one may be tempted to think the Roman church is growing while Protestant churches are dwindling. Haven’t Rome’s defenders been doing such a stellar job with apologetics, so that the conversions are coming fast and furious? Shouldn’t the number
I am listening to yesterday’s Line of Fire radio program with Michael Brown, and he provided some clips from the audio of the debate (we were having an uber-geek contest: he bested me with his cool pen that records audio and other cool stuff, and I had him with my uber-cool iPad connected to the net via my Droid’s 3g
The guys at Christ the Center recently discussed the issue of Natural Theology and in particular Michael Sudduth’s book The Reformed Objection to Natural Theology. On the panel was one of my favorite writers in apolologetics Dr. Scott Oliphint and James Dolezal. This is a deep discussing but worth the listen Click here to listen. For Oliphint’s discussion on theology
My busy schedule has left me little time to write, however, I do still check in on a number of Roman Catholic apologists each day. Here’s what I found today. In some cases, there really isn’t anything new under the sun. Take for instance Gerry Matatics. Gerry updates his website a few times a year, if that. His recent offering
Sam Shamoun joined me live in studio today. We started off with a discussion of the debate that took place Tuesday evening on the Jewish Voice Broadcast here in Phoenix (Sam was in the audience), and then started taking calls on a wide variety of issues, including one from the ever enigmatic TurretinFan!
When I get word from the folks at the Jewish Voice Broadcast I will let you know when they plan to air the debate that took place last evening. I teamed up with Dr. Michael Brown in defending the biblical doctrine of the Trinity against Sir Anthony Buzzard, who taught at the Atlanta Bible College for 24 years, and Joseph
Gave a report on this past weekend’s debates in Santa Fe with Robert Sungenis, a little preview of the debate this evening on the Jewish Voice Broadcast where I am teaming up with Michael Brown to defend the Trinity (no, I cannot live stream it, but, of course, it will air on the program in the near future), and then
As our readers know, I have a two-on-two debate tomorrow evening here in Phoenix, where I will team up with Dr. Michael Brown in defense of the Trinity against two unitarians, including Sir Anthony Buzzard. So I have not had time for blogging, and evidently the rest of the team is just as busy as I am. My apologies. But
Two months ago I posted the following video in which I ask Dr. Geisler to answer three questions. Two months have passed, and Dr. Geisler has remained silent. The game plan of those involved in the cover-up of the Ergun Caner Scandal is now clear. Taking a page directly from the political play book (that seems to be the new
It’s a beautiful morning here in Santa Fe. I have become accustomed to arising early in the mornings of late, but this morning—I didn’t. It takes quite a while to wind down after two full debates (on two widely divergent topics), so I didn’t get to bed overly early either. In any case, I’m 4/6ths of the way through the
I had a chance to sit down with Anees Zaka and ask the question. Nothing professional about the recording.
Augustine wrote: It is by these manners of speech, when we speak of things that do not happen to God as though they did, that we acknowledge it is he who makes them happen to us, those things at least that are praiseworthy, and these only to the extent that scriptural usage allows it. I mean, we certainly ought not
Last evening I attempted to reason with Dr. Jones, of “Burn the Qur’an” fame, on ABN last night. At least I tried, and made my offer to him! My call begins 3:15 into the following video, and concludes in the second video:
As the media ramps up for the “Qur’an Burning Crisis” of 9/11/10 (can you really believe this?) I simply had to make a further comment (beyond what I said on the DL yesterday). I’m against the burning of the Qur’an because it is not accompanied with any meaningful discussion of the errors of the Qur’an, let alone a positive presentation
Well…here it comes. From Friday the 10th through Friday the 24th I will be engaged in four debates—one in defense of the doctrines of grace, one on the Bodily Assumption of Mary (which I assure you will be a debate on Rome’s claims to ultimate doctrinal authority more than anything else), one on Unitarianism (in partnership with Michael Brown on
Started off with a statement on the “Burning Qur’an’s” fiasco, took a call on Oneness Pentecostalism from London, concluded my comments on Marc Ayer’s claims, took more calls, and finished up with part of the cross-examination between myself and Robert Sungenis from our debate on Papal Infallibility in Florida.
Every few weeks a thread pops up on the Catholic Answers forums relating to yours truly. Most are normally “eye-rollers” involving the penchant of folks to only want to listen to one side, find a quick and easy rebuttal that has little to do with truth, and move on. But recently one has popped up regarding the issues relating to
Our very own TurretinFan will be on Iron Sharpens Iron at 8PM EDT here to continue examining the claims of Christopher Ferrara regarding the truth about Mary. I just learned about it, so I’m blogging the announcement as quickly as I can.
©2025 Alpha and Omega Ministries. All Rights Reserved.
