Archive | King James Onlyism

RSS feed for this section

Steven Avery and Pinto’s Phantom Manuscripts

The article below that I wrote years ago sheds relevant light upon Steven Avery’s textual receptus claim, and Chris Pinto’s conspiratorial claim and his insistence that the TR tradition goes back to the early church period.

http://www.aomin.org/aoblog/index.php/2007/04/19/dean-burgon-and-his-phantom-manuscripts/

See also Ken Willy’s insightful comments on Pinto’s damage control after losing the debate:

http://bibleversiondiscussionboard.yuku.com/topic/5650/Pinto-Post-Debate-Damage-Control#.UssEMPbm-XF

 

 

 

More Commentary on Pinto’s Conspiracy Theory

Fred Butler has further comments on Chris Pinto’s failed performance in the debate:

http://hipandthigh.wordpress.com/2013/12/29/h-p-blavatsky-for-the-defense/

http://hipandthigh.wordpress.com/2013/12/16/why-the-whitepinto-debate-matters/

(Incidentally, I find it telling that Chris Pinto and Brannon Howse refuse to post the debate audio on their respective websites for their people to listen to. If they think Pinto “won” the debate, why not post it? I think we all know the answer to this.)