Author Archive for: DrOakley

“It seems to me that what Dr. Silverman ought to do tonight is he ought to become a Christian who doesn’t believe in Biblical inerrancy. That would be a perfectly consistent conclusion for him to draw as a result of tonight’s debate. That God exists, that He has revealed Himself in Christ, but he’s not ready yet to believe in

Don’t think I can keep this pace up, but I hope it is helpful! Played the entirety of the Perkins/Reeves debate on the Godhead on the stream, and then did a 90 minute DL yesterday afternoon. Started out the first half hour finishing up reviewing each of the references to me and my work by Micah Coate in his horrific

Another 90 minute jumbo addition of the program today, with the first hour spent reviewing Abdullah Kunde’s opening statement in a debate with Samuel Green. Then we opened the phones…well, I guess, took Skype calls, mainly, on the TNIV, George Bryson’s dishonesty, and the size of Pope Urban the V’s right ring finger—OK, not quite, it was about some issues

Went for two hours today, having planned to cover four topics at 30 minutes each—and failing that plan miserably. I took way too much time responding to Micah Coate’s attempt to get around Romans 9 by chopping it up into disparate, disconnected parts and ignoring the flow of thought and argumentation. I have been told that in this he is

We started out tracing the genesis of the incredibly absurd misrepresentation promoted by George Bryson and Micah Coate in their books against Calvinism. We tracked down the original source, and then compared the reality of what was said on the Bible Answer Man broadcast with what has been reported by Bryson and Coate. The contrast is stark. Then we took

I do not know if we have ever done a two hour DL before. Possibly. In any case, I did not even get through half of what I wanted to cover. So, we will do another DL, though not a two hour one, tomorrow. Might go for a jumbo, we will see. In any case, today I dedicated the program

Evidently I forgot to blog the DL from Tuesday. We continued both debates we have been reviewing.

What is a Mega Radio Free Geneva? It’s one that lasts for two hours! Yes indeed, three to five PM this afternoon. Why such a long RFG? Well, when you read a book endorsed by Paige Patterson, George Bryson, C. Gordon Olson, Tim LaHaye, Earl Radmacher, and Jerry Vines (there had been an endorsement earlier by that shining example of

Well, Will Kinney got his 15 minutes of fame today…ok, 12 minutes, 19 seconds to be exact. I started off the program, explained the situation relating to Erasmus’ problems in accurately obtaining the text of the book of Revelation, went over what The King James Only Controversy says on the issue (including the footnotes containing relevant information), and then played

I can’t stop! Well, OK, I can, just haven’t chosen to do so. Did another 90 minute version today because I had some e-mail questions I wanted to get to, so did that in the first half hour, then got back to Slick/Perkins, then on to Fernandes/Comis. Didn’t get very far in either debate, but again, hopefully useful information and

No, this isn’t going to become routine. I don’t think. I will definitely do a “regular” DL on Thursday, for example. But, did another 90 minute version today. Thirty minutes on the Fernandes/Comis debate (well, sorta…snuck too much in about other items), thirty minutes on the Slick/Perkins debate, and then thirty minutes of open phones, with calls on apologetic methodology,

We will dedicate thirty minutes to the Fernandes/Comis debate, thirty minutes to the Perkins/Slick debate, and thirty minutes to your phone calls on another Jumbo DL tomorrow!

Finished off 4.5 hours of live DL’s this week with another 90 minute edition. This time I broke it into three half-hour segments. First segment finished off the lengthy e-mail to which I dedicated a total of 2 hours of response. The second segment continued our examination of the Fernandes/Comis debate, continuing our response to Dr. Fernandes’ opening statement. The

We continued our response to a lengthy email I received regarding God’s sovereignty, theodicy, the nature of Adam and Eve, judgment, etc., in the first 45 minutes of the program today, followed in the last half by, I believe, a whopping four minutes of Dr. Phil Fernandes’ opening statement (which means I provided a lot of commentary, including a fairly

Today’s DL was 90 minutes in length to give me time to launch into two new studies. First, I began responding to a lengthy e-mail relating to the grounds upon which God can justly judge men in light of His sovereignty. Then, after 45 minutes on that I moved into a review of the Fernandes/Comis debate on the Five Points

Started off the program today talking to our good friend David Ould who is in town, visiting from Sydney. We talked about life as a Sydney Anglican, etc., for the first half of the program. Then we launched back into our Radio Free Geneva examination of Bob Coy’s sermon against Calvinism.

Started off with Brother Jack’s sub-six minute sermon on Calvinism. I’d love to give you the link, but as soon as I contacted him about it, he pulled it. But, Zeb the Calvinist had saved it on his Droid, so…we reviewed it, rather fully. It was titled, “Calvinists Don’t Believe in Any of the Solas.” Then we moved back to